ere instead murdered by Hamas terrorists’ “bare hands”.
It matters not to a BBC correspondent. The Jews are always guilty.
A BBC newsroom source told the JC: “How a top BBC correspondent can turn huge horrifying posters of Netanyahu as a zombie Dracula peering over the hostages, and rows and rows of Israeli coffins into simply 'imagery of the consequences of Israel's campaign' is deeply worrying. Worse still, nobody batted an eyelid. Serious questions need to be answered."
Alex Hearn, Director of Labour Against Antisemitism (LAAS), criticised Adams for “whitewashing” Hamas’ antisemitic propaganda. "What was depicted wasn’t a failed military campaign but medieval blood libel," Hearn stated.
One of the BBC's top correspondents, it's clear, can't tell the difference.
Meanwhile, Adams’ old posts on social media have resurfaced, prompting questions about his impartiality. In one post from October 7, 2023, he referred to the Hamas attack that day as a “mass breakout,” describing it as “audacious (and yes brutal).” The following day, he called the massacre “the day Gazans broke out of their dismal prison and exacted terrible revenge.”
On October 17, Adams suggested Israeli forces had bombed the al-Ahli hospital, a claim later contradicted by intelligence reports that linked the explosion to a failed rocket launch from within Gaza.
He wrote: “Deeply disturbing reports from Gaza City tonight, with suggestion that 100s of Palestinians have been killed at al-Ahli hospital. Full of the wounded and those seeking shelter from Israel's bombardment. IDF can't yet say if this was an air strike.”
Deeply disturbing reports from inside the BBC.
Leave a Reply