usly. Based on the available scientific evidence, inclusion will occur at the expense of fairness and possibly safety. Put differently, fairness cannot be guaranteed to biological females by the current inclusion policies.
Of course, as I say, we know all this. It's like a lecture on how we know that the earth revolves around the sun. But we keep having to point out the obvious in the face of all this sudden trans ideology.
Nor should transgender inclusion be "a thorny issue". It's really not an issue at all: it's obviously absurd. Why should all this effort and fuss be expended on the supposed sporting requirements of the tiny number of men who've decided to live as women? Who cares? What with the "inclusivity"? They can play all the sport they want, after all, but if it's competitive sport they want, then they compete in the right category – as men.
And of course it's not a transgender issue as such: it's a transwoman issue. We hear not a peep from transmen about inclusivity and their need for validation on the sports field, for obvious reasons: they'd lose. They'd be pummelled, battered, bruised, and humiliated. Transwomen, on the other hand, start with a huge built-in advantage. That's why they want to do it so badly. It is, basically, a scam.
Plus, you can't help thinking, there's the TWAW – trans women are women – mantra. If we don't allow trans women to compete as women in sport, then we're pointing out that, no, trans women aren't really women at all. And that would never do.
Update: see Graham Linehan – Laurel Hubbard and the triumph of the mediocre man.
Leave a Reply