The end of Quilliam

Written by

in

etrators appeared to be disproportionately of Muslim background, Quilliam did a great service in not only addressing the issue but doing so from a Muslim direction. This suggested to Muslims and non-Muslims alike that there were Muslims in this country willing to stand up to these problems, not simply sweep them under the rug and condemn people who’d noticed them.

Once again the response was clear. Every Islamist and Islamist-sympathising group and individual in the UK lammed into Quilliam. It was accused of being ‘far right’ or aiding the ‘far right’, just as it had spent years being accused of ‘Islamophobia’.

Of course, as we see from the above links, such accusations were also prominent across the left – most notably in the Guardian.

It is interesting, this disproportionate vitriol targeted not just at reformers but at real prominent moderates within Islam. The hatred and venom aimed at Nawaz and his colleagues has been exceptional. They have literally had to fear for their lives. And the hatred has far outweighed any aimed at Islamist groups operating in Britain. Certainly the moderates have got far more flak than the Hamas leaders living here. Or the Jamaat types and other backward tribalists who populate the discourse and occasionally the airwaves. And why should that be?

For two decades now, that has been perhaps the most suggestive question. Outside a school in Batley in recent weeks some Muslims have been organising to intimidate a teacher, his family, bosses and colleagues. Will there be campaigns against them? Will the ‘mainstream’ Muslim organisations do anything to de-escalate the problem? As always they will pretend to be brokers between people who can’t be negotiated with and the state.

I don’t say this with any glee, but anybody who put their chips on Islamic reformation or moderate Islam saving everyone should think on the demise of Quilliam. Some of this country’s best citizens, who happened also to be Muslims, gave Islamic reform a good shot here. But it was they — and not their critics — who as a result became the principal target. Not a good sign. Not a good sign at all.

Yep, it's all very depressing.

Comments

  1. Dom Avatar
    Dom

    I had to google the Trojan Horse Affair. The first article was from The Guardian. “Trojan horse: the real story behind the fake ‘Islamic plot’ to take over schools”

  2. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Well there you go.
    It wasn’t just the Guardian. The Southern Poverty Law Centre in the US called Maajid Nawaz an “anti-Muslim extremist”. That’s the kind of shit they had to deal with from the left. So he sued the bastards and got some $3m.

  3. StarDasher Avatar
    StarDasher

    Interesting that the MME link ‘branded’, leads to a Douglas Murray article from 2009 in the Guardian. He was then much more sceptical of QF than he is above, where he virtually laments its passing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *