I do believe he is committed to Nato.” Well, I do not believe the prime minister really believes this and I also believe he does not even expect you, the voters of Britain, to believe it either.
There is no evidence that Donald Trump is committed to Nato and plenty to support the contention that he doesn’t give a bucket of warm spit for the Atlantic alliance. Nor is it in any way obvious that Trump’s vision for an end to Russia’s war on Ukraine has anything in common with the analysis shared by Ukraine’s true friends, that the only acceptable peace deal is one led by, and acceptable to, the Ukrainians themselves. Indeed, all the evidence available to us indicates that Trump’s vision for “peace” requires the dismemberment of Ukraine and the carving up of its assets between Russia and, remarkably, the United States itself.
Starmer’s lies about Trump are so obvious they now have a kind of pantomime quality. We know that the prime minister knows he is not saying what he truly believes. It is a performance and in its way an audacious one….
The lie is important and risky and dangerous and, in the end, perversely admirable. Flattering Trump is unpleasant but more rewarding than telling the truth. The reality is that Trump is a man of negligible moral value whose administration is a shameful exercise in degrading the US on a daily basis. This truth is self-evident and hardly needs to be amplified by the prime minister.
For you deal with the president you get, not the one you dream of. Britain is not Athens to America’s Rome — and never was — but if Britain’s place is to be a kind of bridge between Europe and the US it follows that Britain cannot blow up the bridge itself. If you accept the prime minister’s strategic analysis, you have little choice but to accept his tactical untruths too.
For Starmer is not a newspaper columnist and the King’s ministers are not social media pundits. There is no need for Starmer to say what we know he must truly think about Trump, for doing so cannot advance the national interest. So the fiction is to be swallowed, though it must also be digested without any accompanying illusions….
The prime minister has played a limited hand as well as can be expected but his success is only relative and depends on voters understanding his motives. It is fine to reject choosing between the US and Europe right up until the moment when the bridge collapses. Push always comes to shove and the British people understand that this American administration cannot be trusted. They are not enemies yet but nor are they the friends they were.
For the time being though, Starmer’s noble lies still stand. They are in such plain sight, after all, that they can hardly be misunderstood except — the prime minister must hope — in the Oval Office itself. If you must lie, and sometimes you must, it may be best to lie bigly. This is a strange form of leadership but it is leadership nonetheless.
I very much doubt that Starmer sees any of this as a humiliation. He's a lawyer by training: he's used to this kind of necessary prevarication.