Blog

Democrats change course immediately and publicly hold themselves accountable for what they have done to women and girls as a sex class, I have no plans to vote for them in 2024. And I am not alone,” she wrote in 2023.

She speaks for many opponents of ‘gender identity’ who began on the left, who mostly still hold out hope for party reform, but remain disappointed with the party. Dansky grew up believing “that the Democrats were the party that cared about the working class, feminism, free speech, gay rights, and civil rights generally.”

Today the Democrats pretend to not know what a woman even is. Democrats cannot be the party of women and also pretend that they don’t know what a woman is. Working class voters have no time for such contradictions.

are thick as shit.

Reform is surging because the lanyard class refuses to listen to voters when the reality they describe conflicts with its liberal shibboleths. Voters are told crime is down, but they know shoplifting or vandalism goes unreported because police never act. They see the effects of unprecedented mass migration in rapid change to their high streets and NHS surgeries. With up to 1,000 small boat arrivals a week being dispersed, many more communities have a local hotel turned over to bored, undocumented, non-English-speaking young men.

When voters learn that hotel accommodation will cost three times what was predicted, while pensioners’ winter fuel allowance is cut, or that Labour plans to scoop up swathes of rented housing for migrants on five-year contracts when their kids can’t find a home, of course they’re angry. The idea the government will deport those without good English is laughable when convicted foreign criminals are allowed to stay. They did not vote for this, they can’t even speak of it. (They risk being accused of “dog whistling” by Lucy Powell.)

Like a national HR department, the government cares only about “compliance”. So people are turning to a party, as makeshift as a flat-pack bookshelf, simply because it doesn’t shut them down. It is not Reform voters who are stupid.

There's a social media trend – I see it on Facebook – for showing posts from Trump supporters: from before the election, with "Hey, I'm for Trump and sticking it to those liberals", followed by the more recent "Hey, what's going on? My business has been ruined." The lesson? These are really really stupid people who deserve what they're getting. Ha, ha, ha! So, no lessons need to be learnt by us: we're the smart ones who were right all along.

Yes, sure, Trump was never the answer. But sticking it to the liberals? Well….these were the liberals who were saying people could just change sex on demand, who were in thrall to trans ideology, who were overseeing the trashing of American higher education and just about every facet of American life with DEI and Black Lives Matter and diversity hiring and all the rest. But just as Labour aren't listening, so the Democrats and liberal America aren't listening. "Hey, we were right all along". But the people know better.

nd paid lip service to ever since. Crucially, the government must urgently enforce a zero-tolerance stance by establishing a system of escalating financial sanctions for non-compliant institutions.

Failure to do so not only threatens Jewish students but the integrity of universities as safe spaces for all.

to that support that she was able to fight back — and win.

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling that “woman” means biological female under the Equality Act, the FA has now U-turned, scrapping its transgender inclusion policy: from June, males will be barred from the female game. That’s the right decision — but it comes too late for girls like Cerys, who were punished under speech codes that should never have existed.

Female players in single-sex football leagues should never have been forced to compete against men, given how much stronger, faster and more physically aggressive male players are, on average. For a teenage girl to receive a six-game ban simply for asking whether an opposing player was a man was a grotesque injustice — and we’re proud to have helped her get the decision overturned.

Telegraph report here.

‘I don’t think the opinions of a very, very small minority should be put over the opinions of thousands and thousands of women throughout the country. I think we should be prioritised’

"I want London to grow and thrive over the next decade and our creative industries have a central role to play. They help make London the greatest city in the world"

– Sadiq Khan, announcing backing for the film industry

The unwanted company of Gal Gadot's filming crew, today. pic.twitter.com/maxw3UX5AI

— habibi (@habibi_uk) May 9, 2025

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

ont-size: 11pt”>Denyer’s Deputy, Zack Polanski, who reportedly once set himself up as a hypnotherapist for breast enlargement, has recently launched his campaign to be Leader. I would challenge him on how a party can remain credible for telling the truth on climate science but continue to tell lies about what constitutes a biological woman. The Party is so negligent about equality law, they’ve retained gender self-identification as a criterion for eligibility to satisfy quotas for the leadership contest.

The Greens are clearly now, as Julie Bindel argued the other day, the bonkers party.

Stella O'Malley draws a parallel between the grooming gangs scandal and the explosion of "gender dysphoria":

It’s striking how two seemingly unrelated issues can sometimes reveal the same deep-rooted problems in society. On the one hand there are the UK grooming gang scandals – horrifying crimes, ignored for decades, involving networks of Pakistani Muslim men who targeted vulnerable teenage girls. On the other, there’s the sudden explosion of teenagers, particularly girls, identifying as trans – many of whom are suffering irreversible harm as a consequence of inappropriate medical transition. At first glance you may not think these two crises have much in common, but scratch the surface and a disturbing pattern emerges.

In both cases, the adults in charge looked the other way. Institutions minimised. Social workers made the wrong calls. Mental health professionals rarely helped – and often caused harm. Journalists stayed silent. Officials deflected. Very few people in positions of authority had the courage to confront the shocking reality, and those who did were labelled as bigots.

Meanwhile parents’ pleas were ignored and dismissed as either “Islamophobic” or “transphobic”…

On that new digital ID system:

Digital forms of ID will soon replace paper docs. If you’re a disabled woman & want a female carer you may ask for proof of biological sex. But if data for digital ID is taken from any document other than birth certificate, the sex marker may be false. Who cares, say Labour MPs! https://t.co/bVexmfAgtl

— Miriam Cates (@miriam_cates) May 8, 2025

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

/span>

There's no way around this. A service is either single sex, or mixed sex. If it's mixed sex, it can't lawfully exclude some men because they are men, while admitting others who say they are women. If it's single sex, by definition it excludes all men.

The idea that a genuinely single-sex service might still face challenge as indirect discrimination on grounds of gender reassignment is, to coin a phrase, an obvious absurdity.

The slam-dunk justification would be: "We can't let you in, or we'd be a mixed-sex service. We'd lose the protection of whatever exception we're using, and we'd have to let all the other men in as well."

Let's get one other thing straight, while we're at it.

Women have been gaslit, bullied, threatened, dismissed, smeared, and sometimes physically attacked for standing up for these rights to ordinary, everyday privacy and dignity.

We have been told that even asking politely for these rights is "transphobic" and "not worthy of respect in a democratic society". Even the right to talk about such things at work has had to be bitterly fought for, in case after case in the employment tribunals.

Now the Supreme Court has authoritatively ruled that sex is real, and sometimes matters. In other words, what trans activists have tried to paint as a niche belief is now beyond doubt the law of the land.

That vindication leaves a great deal of anger in its wake. Anyone who instructs their lawyers to try to find a way of wiggling round the clear, unequivocal ruling of the Supreme Court can expect to have a fight on their hands.

For too long, a vocal, bullying minority has terrorised employers and service-providers into operating everything that should be single-sex on a "trans inclusive" basis, for fear of lawsuits.

Well, women fighting for their single-sex spaces now unequivocally have the law on their side.

So employers and service-providers will probably face lawsuits for a while whatever they do. If tempted to continue to permit men to violate the privacy of their female colleagues or fellow-customers, they should ask themselves a simple question.

"Do we feel lucky?"

Ff”>https://t.co/cEORwELIFf

— Graham Linehan 🎗️ (@Glinner) May 8, 2025

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js