ved in their preferred gender for two years. Since then only about 5,000 people have received a gender recognition certificate, but the “best estimate” of the trans population in the UK now, according to Stonewall, is “about 600,000”. And it isn’t just adults. From 2009 to 2019 the number of boys seeking help from the NHS Gender Identity Development Service for children went up by 1,460 per cent and the number of girls by 5,337 per cent. In 2018 the youngest patient was three.
Many of the children have been prescribed “puberty blockers”, drugs licensed for prostate cancer and endometriosis, Stock explains, but not for children with gender dysphoria, and most of those have gone on to take cross-sex hormone treatment. But as children set out to make permanent changes to their bodies, trans adults increasingly don’t. Trans activist organisations have lobbied against the medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria and for a system of “self-ID”. Pick your gender. No need to pander to stereotypes and change your body. Get over it.
Material Girls shows how far we have rushed to do just that. Politicians of all the big parties, celebrities, charity leaders, business leaders, doctors and many of our national institutions have signed up to the new reality. So have public health bodies, which have swapped words like “women”, “girls” and “vagina” for “menstruators”, “cervix-havers” and “front hole”. As the period tracker app Clue explained in 2016, “using the word ‘female’ or ‘female-bodied’ is offensive to some”. Sex, it seems, is so last century. It is, says Stonewall, “a person’s innate sense of their own gender” that makes them a man or woman. It is, in other words, Stock says, “an inner feeling”. We have, she explains, changed our language, and some of our laws and institutions, on the basis of a new theory called “gender identity”. The trouble is, says Stock, the theory doesn’t stack up.
Indeed it doesn't, with Judith Butler and her post-modernist nonsense — no surprise – fingered as chief progenitor.
She starts her inquisition with a survey of the philosophical ideas that have led to this point, from Simone de Beauvoir’s statement that “one is not born, but rather becomes a woman” to Anne Fausto-Sterling’s view that biological sex is “a continuum” (a view that may have contributed to Facebook’s present offer of 71 gender options) and Judith Butler’s view, developed from poststructural philosophy, that it’s language that creates biological reality and not the other way round. This ingenious theory is the heart and soul of the new world view. Unfortunately it presents all kinds of complications when it comes to healthcare, work, data collection, the criminal justice system, conflicting rights of different groups of vulnerable people, policy and sport….
The trans activists have, she explains, hit the bedroom too. A trans woman with an unchanged male body may now “self-identify” as a lesbian. She (to use her preferred pronoun, which Stock politely does throughout) may want to have sex with lesbians. But lesbians, Stock tells us, are sexually attracted to adults with a female body. Campaigners call this the “cotton ceiling” and run workshops on how to overcome it.
What this all amounts to, Stock concludes, is “an immersive fiction”. And it isn’t optional. Male and female bodies have different body strengths, different sexual characteristics and are vulnerable to different diseases, but to point out these differences is to break a taboo. “In my opinion,” she says, “immersion in a fiction about sex change is being coercively required of people.” It’s one thing to choose to do that out of a kind of courtesy, she says, but quite another to “indicate that these things are literally true”.
I wonder if – and how – the Guardian will review.