Blog

  • Dystopian healthcare

    as I understand it, was recommended by Hilary Cass as part of her review. It was a mistake. We don't need more evidence about the effects of powerful drugs – as used to chemically castrate sex offenders – on confused young children. It would be a horror show: like taking a group of "gender dysphoric" young girls, giving half of them double mastectomies, and see which group – the mutilated or the unmutilated – feels better afterwards. It's contrary to every medical ethic.

    This is not a healthcare model. It’s dystopian. It tramples over ethics, evidence and common sense, echoing the darkest chapters of medical history, when vulnerable people were used as guinea pigs in experiments dressed up as ‘care’….

    Let the tomboys be. Let the feminine boys wave their fairy wands and find their own path. Let kids be weird and wild. That’s childhood.

    Puberty is not an error to be corrected. It’s the bridge between who we were and who we’re becoming. Blocking it doesn’t hit pause. It derails the individual onto a pathway of lifelong medicalisation.

  • Hebrew and Yiddish

    sh representation. It is such a contrast to the derision with which they often treat Hebrew, which to this day is the only successful example of large-scale linguistic revival. An indisputably remarkable and unmatched linguistic feat.

    It illustrates how, at best, anti-Zionist activists want Jews to be: minorities all over the world who should be allowed to express their identity (at least the aspects of that identity that are deemed acceptable) within their diaspora countries, but not a liberated people. Not a people with self-determination: speaking their indigenous language daily in a nation of their own in their ancestral homelands.

    Added, from Simon Schama:

    "anti Zionists today also fearful of Hebrew as proof of indigeneity – however much revived as daily vernacular it remains in all crucial respects the identical language as that used by the writers of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the ( beautiful ) Hebrew of the Mishnah"

    "the Mishnah btw codified in 3rd century Galilee.. Hebrew and Judaism never left"

  • Trans for Iran

    ave you joined the dots yet?"

    [The "India" Ted Cruz refers to is of course notorious trans activist and Rowling-hater-extraordinaire India Willoughby, who's come out for Team Iran and will no doubt be thrilled by this extra bit of publicity.]

  • At the Palestine Action protest in Manchester

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Falsely accused of Islamophobia

    the complaint appropriately, they then compounded the risk by ­equivocating about my innocence.

    “By saying they recognised concerns, and taking off the module because of student sensitivities, it looks like a whitewash, like they still had lingering suspicions about me.”

    He was stitched up, and the university went along with it. Sheer cowardice.

    Twelve groups, including the Free Speech Union, Academics for Academic Freedom, Alumni for Free Speech and Christian Concern, have written to the regulator asking it to investigate Bristol.

    They pointed out that the university had a legal duty to take reasonably ­practicable steps to ensure freedom of speech within the law for its students and staff, but took no visible steps to do so in Greer’s case. They allege that ­Bristol’s failures resulted in the ­censorship of lawful expression and that, as in the Stock case, there was a failure to take reasonable steps to ­protect academics from physical harm.

    Key failures, according to the groups, include allowing the complaint despite numerous procedural flaws, failing to take action on the aggressive social ­media campaign by disciplining any students who were involved, and ­cancelling Greer’s module even though he had been exonerated.

    Given the scandal, the complaint notes, it would be a “brave scholar” who would make legitimate observations about Islam in a similar context.

    Well quite. Discussion of Islam, let alone criticism of Islam, is becoming increasingly discouraged. As if, perhaps, it might be blasphemous.

  • The NHS trust Pride calendar

    “>A hospital trust at the centre of a row over transwomen sharing female changing rooms has come under fire for producing a Pride calendar celebrating “polyamory” and “pansexuality”.

    County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust is being sued by eight nurses who claim that a policy allowing transwomen to use single-sex changing rooms puts women at risk….

    But a Pride calendar sent to staff has stirred further criticism of the trust over claims that bosses are more concerned with protecting LGBT rights than those of women.

    The 36-page document, Pride Month 2025, begins with a graphic in which each day in June is dedicated to celebrating an LGBT theme. These include images of flags placed on different dates that represent a variety of “genders” and sexualities that people can identify as.

    Among these are flags for the polyamorous — defined in the booklet as “a relationship style in which more than two people engage in intimate, consensual relationship” — and the pansexual, described as individuals “attracted to all types of people” regardless of “gender or sexual orientation”.

    Other flags represent those who identify as asexual, explained as people who “may experience little sexual attraction or none at all”….

    Elsewhere the document advises staff advice on providing “safe spaces” for LGBTQ+ people.

    There's someone high up at the Durham and Darlington trust that seems to be pushing this, and no one dares speak up – apart from the Darlington nurses.

    Some staff at the hospital say the exercise is “divisive”, particularly in the light of the case of the eight Darlington nurses, strengthened by the recent Supreme Court ruling that, under equality law, women and men are defined by biological sex.

    One female hospital employee said: “Why should an individual’s sexuality or kinks be not only brought into the workplace but actively promoted and forced on staff? Following the Supreme Court ruling, it is incredibly insensitive and hostile to be trying to ‘educate’ staff on these issues.

    “This exposes that County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust has an extreme agenda and are keen to be seen as ‘inclusive’ while continuing to exclude women and ignoring their rights to basic dignity.”

    Further concerns have been raised over the booklet’s directing staff towards Mermaids, a charity for trans youth, as one of the 11 “LGBT focused charities” it lists.

    Hmm. Someone high up with a transed child, perhaps.

    Shelley Charlesworth of Transgender Trend, a parent-led group that campaigns to raise awareness of the sharp rise in children identifying as trans, said: “No part of the NHS should be endorsing Mermaids, a charity which was opposed to the ban by the NHS on puberty blockers and which has a history of controversies in its dealing with children.”

  • Abandoning self-identification language

    From the Times:

    Judges will no longer have to refer to criminal defendants by the gender of their choice in an update after the Supreme Court’s transgender ruling.

    The revised guidance abandons self-identification language and reaffirms the binary definition of sex to state that the legal definition of a woman means biological female rather than sex attained by the acquisition of a gender recognition certificate (GRC).

    It says that non-binary status has no legal footing and sets out that courts may refuse contested pronouns.

    Rape suspects should not be referred to as female and there is “no entitlement” for anyone to use single-sex services intended for the opposite sex, the guidance says.

    It previously stated that judges should refer to criminal defendants by the gender they have chosen for themselves.

    About bloody time. Will we now see an end to press reports of women rapists, "her penis" and so on? That'd be nice.

  • Standing with Iran

    Dave Rich – The right side of history:

    What does it take for a demonstrator, marching through central London, to hold a placard declaring that a regime that maims and blinds young women for the ‘crime’ of wanting to choose how they dress is on the right side of history?

    Why is it that so many women on that same march happily chanted “We Stand With Iran” while dressed in a way that would see them beaten and imprisoned by that same Iranian regime, and despite all the horrors it perpetrates on its own people, most of whom would be glad to see the back of it (even if they don’t welcome Israeli and American bombs)?

    It was entirely predictable that the pro-Palestinian movement that has solidified on our streets and online since October 7 would swing firmly behind Iran once Israel – and now the United States – bombed Iran’s nuclear and other military facilities. That the Iranian regime hangs gay men from cranes was never going to stop Owen Jones from choosing the Iranian side in this war. Any discussions about the true intentions of Iran’s nuclear programme, the state of international negotiations, and the possible ways this conflict now plays out are a distraction from the only thing that matters: the belief that Israel is always in the wrong, that its actions are never justified, and that everything it does is a crime of inhumane cruelty that exceeds rational explanation. All else flows from that; all is justified in opposition to it….

    Shorter version:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Exposing the weakness of the Islamic Republic

    Kyle Orton at UnHerd on the Trump bombings:

    Trump was reluctant to carry out this action, and reportedly tried to minimise the fallout by communicating to the Iranian leadership in advance that the strikes were a one-off, strictly limited to the nuclear weapons programme and with no intention to threaten the regime itself. This did not stop the Iranians vowing “everlasting consequences”, but perhaps what moved the US President to commit to strikes was the realisation that there is nothing the Islamic Republic can actually do.

    Israel has thoroughly infiltrated Iran, causing the suppression of air defences in the first hours of this campaign. It has killed swathes of Tehran’s senior leadership and struck nuclear facilities, the missile programme, and even energy infrastructure. Israel crippled Iran’s ability to carry out foreign terrorism years ago, reducing the country’s response to sporadic and increasingly ineffective missile barrages.

    The Islamic regime governing Iran has prospered because of its enemies’ timidity, which has been justified by Tehran being on the threshold of nuclear weapons. Israel’s actions over the past two years — in devastating Iranian outposts around the region and then taking the war to the central node in Tehran — have shaken this paradigm. Whether the American strikes have completely disarmed Iran or not, Trump has provided the opportunity to discard it altogether. The weakness of the Islamic Republic has been exposed and a precedent set. If there are future negotiations with Iran, all sides now know the West has cards to play which it has denied itself for too long.

    What Iran can do – what they've threatened to do – is close the Strait of Hormuz, shutting off the oil tankers from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. The Saudis would not be pleased, and, facing a weakened Iran and with the support of America, might feel tempted to respond with some force of their own…

  • Evin prison

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js