Blog

  • A supporter of progressive causes

    And, talking of Reduxx, here's their latest report – Trans Activist Day Care Worker Arrested For Sexual Abuse Of Six Young Children:

    An assistant early childhood educator in Florianópolis, Brazil, has been taken into custody after multiple children alleged that he sexually abused them. Allec Sander de Oliveira Ribeiro, 34, worked at the Nossa Senhora de Lourdes Center for Municipal Childhood Education and was known for his vocal support of progressive causes.

    On July 1, the Civil Police of Santa Catarina arrested Ribeiro following a month-long investigation into reports of sexual abuse at a local daycare. The probe began in June, after several parents reported that their children had disclosed abuse. According to the parents, the children had exhibited troubling behavioral changes in the lead-up to their disclosures. Authorities notified the Municipal Secretariat of Education, which suspended Ribeiro from his position on June 5.

    Police subsequently raided Ribeiro’s home and searched his electronic devices, uncovering more than 6,000 files containing child sexual abuse material. Investigators say many of the files appear to have been produced by Ribeiro himself. Some of the victims were identified as Ribeiro’s students, and there was material that had been recorded on the daycare premises. Officers also discovered three additional hard drives concealed in his home; the total number of illicit files is now estimated to exceed 10,000….

    Jornal Razão reports that Ribeiro was known as a supporter of progressive causes, and displayed both the LGBT and trans pride flags on his social media accounts, where he also frequently posted popular cartoon characters and references to youth media. Journalist Lorran Barentin described this as a “possible strategy to mask criminal conduct.”

    Ribiero’s progressive public persona helped him cultivate trust with parents, one of whom noted: “The hardest part is that he was close to everyone. He used the right words, said the right things, and no one suspected him. But now the mask has fallen off.”

    So it would seem.

  • Men with a misogyny fetish

    Genevieve Gluck, co-founder of Reduxx, knows the psychology of trans-identified men better than most.

    Something I have learned in the process of writing about trans-identified male rapists and pedophiles for several years is that most women truly have no idea how much these men hate them.

    "Trans women" are men with a misogyny fetish. They hold women in such contempt that publicly humiliating the female sex arouses and thrills them. To be a woman is a humiliating experience, they believe, and so play-acting as though they are women is their sadomasochistic and exhibitionistic game.

    Womanhood is a vehicle for their masturbation, nothing more. When they demand the public "validate" their version of womanhood, they are implicitly forcing agreement with their view that women exist to be used, to be sexually abused, to be objectified and humiliated.

    Yet despite this, women and girls are gaslit about it at every turn – chastised, condescended to, and told to be kind to men who have made a fetish their entire personality.

    All the while, women and girls are also blamed for these men's actions. For not standing up for themselves, for being too permissive, or, as a monolith when other women support them.

    So it's better to establish a firm boundary, to say "no" as loud as we like, and to not let ourselves be made to feel guilty for recognizing woman-hating when we see it.

    That X post has a video which I don't really want to put up here. Nasty. But it certainly shows a particularly vile trans misogyny – and Gluck's been involved in exposing this stuff for years, so she knows what she's talking about….

  • Sex slaves in Syria

    say that all kinds of violence are continuing against the Alawites. One posted a video of a restaurant being attacked by bearded gunmen for selling alcohol. They fear the future in Syria is Islamist and authoritarian.

    In Afghanistan, the Taliban Mark 2 returned to power promising a new, more liberal version of rule by sharia. Now they are as hardline as ever. In Syria, the international community is giving President al-Sharaa’s new government the benefit of the doubt for the time being. He was put into power by a wide coalition of armed groups. His government may be too weak to protect the Alawites; some of his men may not want to. Can’t or won’t? For the families whose wives or daughters were taken, it makes little difference which.

  • Organ harvesting in Xinjiang

    ternational register.

    Sayragul Sauytbay, a Kazakh doctor who was previously detained in Xinjiang, has spoken publicly about camp-wide “health checks” where detainees had their blood tested and, depending on their results, were then sorted into groups.

    She began to notice that those who were given a pink check mark would soon disappear, concluding it was because of “organ harvesting”.

    While the decision to build the new facilities was made in December last year, the plans have only recently been made public by End Transplant Abuse in China (ETAC), an Australia-based human rights charity.

    The 2019 tribunal determined that the organs of marginalised detainees in China were being forcefully harvested, sometimes when the patients were still alive, to serve a transplant trade worth over $1 billion (£733 million).

    While China has a voluntary organ donation scheme, Wendy Rogers, the chairman of ETAC’s advisory board, told The Telegraph that in many cases they were harvested forcefully, including from otherwise healthy prisoners against their will and who are slowly killed as their organs are removed.

    Earlier this year, it was estimated that at least half a million Uyghurs were in prisons or detention centres. They have also faced decades of persecution by the Chinese government, including mass detention and forced sterilisation.

    Given the history of abuse against the Uyghurs, of whom there are 10 million in Xinjiang, there is concern that the new transplant facilities will result in more forced organ harvesting among the population.

    The imprisoned Uighurs, obviously, make an ideal captive source for organ harvesting. It's a huge market, and the wealthy buyers will pay more for organs from healthy donors – or rather, healthy bodies. Members of the persecuted Falun Gong religious sect, who didn't smoke or drink, used to be favoured, but the abstemious Muslim Uighurs make a fine replacement.

    “The concept of informed, voluntary consent is meaningless in Xinjiang’s carceral environment,” said David Matas, an international human rights lawyer who has previously investigated organ harvesting in China.

    “Given the systemic repression, any claim that donations are voluntary should be treated with the utmost scepticism.”

    Even before the new facilities were announced, Xinjiang was known as a hub for organ transplants.

    In the province’s capital Urumqi, its airport has green arrows on the ground – known as “Green Passage” lanes – to fast-track the transit of those transporting organs.

    A real dystopian nightmare, then – but of absolutely no interest to the Gaza-obsessed protestors on the streets every day.

  • Shadowy, Kafkaesque complaints

    Jo Phoenix at UnHerd on yesterday's Sullivan Report:

    There is page after page of personal testimony. It speaks of gender-critical academics being taken through shadowy, Kafkaesque complaints processes and of research ethics committees over-reaching their mandate to subvert the research of academics interested in sex and gender. It goes on to describe actual harassment and bullying….

    As if detailing the bigotry faced by gender-critical academics was not enough, the report also tells us something about our universities as a whole. They have become  lawless places where adherence to a political dogma mattered more than the quest for knowledge and truth using the scientific methods of debate, discussion and critique.

    For anyone who has been paying attention, the findings of the Sullivan Review should be no surprise. After all, many of us have been sounding the alarm for nearly a decade. We’ve been saying that a small but highly vocal, very disruptive group of academic activists have been using whatever tactics they can to stop any questions or critique of the (frankly) ridiculous idea that humans can change sex.

  • Moving beyond the gender binary

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Because the victim was a Jew

    to survive: she died last week, as revealed in court documents filed this week. What made this act of savagery especially heinous was the age of the victims. The eight people hospitalised were aged 52 to 88. The oldest, Barbara Steinmetz, was a Holocaust survivor, having fled Nazi Europe as an infant in the 1940s. She escaped Hitler’s flames, but not the flames of the rabid ‘anti-Zionism’ raging in the West in 2025.

  • A tale of two reports

    More from Kathleen Stock on the latest Sullivan Report:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    It's interesting that we've had two reports in the past week or so on a couple of professions where, more than any others perhaps, you'd expect the best of our lovely liberal graduates to gravitate, keen to help spread their enlightened ideas for the benefit of the rest of us. That is, publishing last week, and academia today. Both reports have revealed the the foulest and most vicious abuse aimed at those who've refused to accept the gender ideology that's come to rule in progressive circles. Comparisons with Stalin's Russia and show trials don't seem misplaced to me. No, no one's been led out to be shot, but this is as near as it gets in modern Britain.

    I made the comparison to Lysenko a few months back. It's a grim lesson in the power of ideology – and the sheer unashamed glee with which people seize the chance to bully and persecute "outsider" others when given the chance.

  • Pride in Surrey speak out

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • “We want to live”

    looming danger.

    I was 11 when Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007. At 23, I co-organised my first protest under the slogan “We Want to Live”. For that “crime”, I was imprisoned and tortured multiple times. Today, at 29, after speaking out once again during Hamas’s war with Israel, I know there will be no leniency if the ceasefire takes effect.

    Hamas’s crackdown on dissent is intensifying. Over a dozen people have been killed in recent weeks – one of them a dear friend. Others have had their limbs broken in brutal acts of intimidation. As soon as the ceasefire is announced, Hamas militants will rise from their tunnels, hungry for revenge. Hit lists are already circulating on Telegram.

    This is not a cry for pity – it is a warning. If Hamas is allowed to keep paying its fighters and civil servants in Gaza from the comfort of Doha, then the countdown to another October 7 has already begun. The only way to truly defeat Hamas is to build a civil alternative – a government for and by the people of Gaza, firmly opposed to Hamas’s rule. In the shadow of Yahya Sinwar’s suicidal war, a growing number of us believe this tragic cycle can finally be broken.

    Our grassroots movement wants a real and lasting peace with Israel, not just a ceasefire. We want the Israeli hostages to go home to their families. We want to end the corruption and repression of Hamas, just as we want freedom from Israeli control. We want jobs. We want education. We want to live.

    Not if Palestine Action and all the associated Hamas fan boys have their way. 

    The urgency of addressing Gaza’s aid problem relates, in turn, to the reason the GHF was established to begin with: the bitter legacy of Hamas’s theft and exploitation of humanitarian aid. Since the war began, I have been forced to purchase on the black market, at exorbitant prices, food from donor nations in boxes marked explicitly “not for sale”. Hamas bears responsibility for this tragedy: it diverted aid to fuel its war machine and feed its loyalists, such that it did not reach the people who needed it most. Hamas is desperate to regain control over aid distribution in order to maintain this unjust system which perpetuates Gazan suffering….

    After the war, in a “safe zone”, we must begin to rebuild a society that believes in peace. We need a new curriculum, one that eliminates extremist ideologies. We need a new intellectual revolution before we can even begin to talk about long-term political solutions.

    So that's goodbye to all those UNRWA schools, then. Goodbye to UNRWA altogether.

    Well, good luck. It's not just Hamas you have to overcome, it's much of world opinion – from the UN on down.