“font-size: 11pt”>It said: “A patient with bipolar (who happens also to be trans) who is in a manic state and who does not have capacity may be disinhibited and at risk of disrobing in public. Depending on where they are in their transition, it may be more appropriate for them to be admitted to a ward that is in line with their birth gender … while they are acutely unwell and at risk of ‘outing’ themselves.”
Their "birth gender"? That would be their sex, then – but once you get sucked in to gender-world there's a whole new terminology to be learned.
Other NHS trusts have similar policies. Central and North Western London said that it “respects an individual’s right to self-identify as male or female”, and that transgender women have the right to access women’s support groups and toilets.
However, it said that, in some cases, “further consideration may be needed as to how best to manage a trans individual”. It gave the example of how “a sexually disinhibited pre-operative transsexual individual may be very distressing for other patients on a single sex ward”.
As always, the most important factor is to honour the patient's fantasy about his declared gender. Much lower down comes any consideration of risk to the women in these institutions.
West London NHS Trust, which runs the high-security Broadmoor Hospital — known for housing serial killers, including the late Peter Sutcliffe, the “Yorkshire Ripper” — said: “Staff must use names, titles and hospital accommodation that the service user regards as appropriate.”
"Service user"? In old money, "the patient".
A women’s rights campaigner involved in the audit said: “We have found examples of NHS trusts allowing forensic patients who were born male to self-identify as women.
“Forensic patients are those referred to the NHS from court or prison. They have been deemed a risk to themselves and others. They often have violent offending profiles. It is scary to think that their gender identity would override the safety and dignity of women.
“NHS Trusts are playing Russian roulette with women’s safety. The Supreme Court ruling clarified that single-sex spaces must be single sex, and it is vital that this is now enforced nationally across all hospitals.”
Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy at Sex Matters, said: “It’s deeply disturbing that the safety and welfare of some of the most vulnerable women in London — those in the care of state mental health services — are being so seriously compromised by NHS trusts.
“The Supreme Court judgment was crystal-clear that single-sex services must be run on the basis of biological sex. There is no excuse for a dangerous ‘case-by-case’ approach that deems some men safe to be housed in women’s accommodation.
“These NHS trusts are missing the point: no male patient should ever be allowed in female accommodation under any circumstances. If health care managers cannot understand why this matters so much in mental health services, then they are not fit to run NHS trusts or to have female patients in their care.”
